The biotechnology industry is one of the most hazardous places for stock pickers. Volatility is high, even among the largest companies. Creating new compounds and processes that solve complicated medical problems is not an easy business, and there's frequent failure to get viable new products to market.
Often times, the adage "it's better to be lucky than talented" applies to a biotech's development pipeline. The same can also be said for investors trying to pick big winners from the biotech universe too, which harkens back to a familiar Warren Buffett quote: "Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing."
For investors who don't know ins-and-outs of biotech (like myself), picking individual stocks can be dangerous. That's where an ETF comes in, like the biggest biotech ETF out there: the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund (IBB 0.41%).
Here's how it stacks up next to its peers SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI 0.19%) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotech ETF (FBT 0.83%)
Metric |
iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund |
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF |
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotech ETF |
---|---|---|---|
Fund total net assets |
$8.03 billion |
$4.12 billion |
$2.87 billion |
Number of stocks |
224 |
118 |
30 |
Date of inception |
Feb. 5, 2001 |
Jan. 31, 2006 |
June 19, 2006 |
Annual expense ratio |
0.47% |
0.35% |
0.56% |
Dividend yield |
0.13% |
0.22% |
N/A |
The iShares option is the oldest, largest, and most diverse biotech ETF available, and its expense ratio is industry standard.
It's worth noting over the last decade iShares has lagged behind its competition because of the composition of the fund; iShares weights its holdings by market capitalization. This means the bigger companies drive overall returns, and since those top five holdings have been a mixed bag over the last few years, the fund has also lagged.
Meanwhile, SPDR Biotech and First Trust Biotech ETFs are both equal weighted, with each stock receiving equal representation in the fund. Smaller winners have meant greater returns for these funds, although with more profit comes greater tax implications when the funds are rebalanced.
First, let's look at the makeup of the big-player driven fund:
Top Five Holdings From iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund |
Weight |
Celgene (CELG) |
7.8% |
Biogen (BIIB 1.82%) |
7.7% |
Amgen (AMGN 0.52%) |
7.1% |
Gilead Sciences (GILD 0.39%) |
7.1% |
Illumina (ILMN 0.04%) |
5.7% |
Next, see how smaller companies, which are often takeover targets, drive the growth of the SPDR fund:
Top Five Holdings From SPDR S&P Biotech ETF |
Weight |
Spark Therapeutics (ONCE) |
3.3% |
Puma Biotechnology (PBYI -2.56%) |
2% |
Portola Pharmaceuticals (PTLA) |
2% |
Sage Therapeutics (SAGE) |
1.8% |
Mirati Therapeutics (MRTX) |
1.8% |
And First Trust Biotech too:
Top Five Holdings From First Trust NYSE Arca Biotech ETF |
Weight |
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals (ACAD 9.95%) |
4.1% |
Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS 0.11%) |
4% |
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical (RARE -0.47%) |
3.9% |
Bio-Techne Corporation (TECH -0.36%) |
3.9% |
Charles River Laboratories (CRL 0.64%) |
3.9% |
Is it a buy?
Biotechnology is a unique growth industry, but the risks are higher than average. For those without the technical know-how and the stomach for some wild moves -- even when well-diversified -- the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund is a solid choice. It offers lower overall returns than some of its peers due to the overweighting toward the biggest players in the space, but it has also exhibited the lowest volatility over time. That could make this one of the tamest pure-play bets on the wild sector.
For broader exposure to healthcare, there's also the Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT 0.20%), which has 385 stocks, and 20% of its assets are dedicated specifically to biotech. It has a management fee of just 0.10% a year and is far less volatile than the biotech pure plays because it also includes more stable segments of the healthcare universe.
Nevertheless, for those who want targeted exposure to biotech, the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund is a good option. The management fee is reasonable, and there's plenty of diversification to smooth out a few of the hang-ups that can be problematic with investing in individual biotech stocks.